Following phosphorus, water BMPs can cut inputs without yields

10/08/2013 12:41:00 PM
Sanjay Shukla, Gregory Hendricks and Tom Breza

Editor's note: A special thanks to Dr. Monica Ozores-Hampton at the Southwest Florida Research and Education Center for coordinating The Immokalee Report, of which the article below is part.

Applying BMP (best management practice)-recommended water and phosphorus (P) inputs for seepage-irrigated tomato and watermelon in South Florida can reduce water use and P leaching to groundwater without adversely affecting fruit yield.

These are the findings of a 3-year comprehensive UF/IFAS study at the Southwest Florida Research and Education Center in Immokalee. The study determined BMP effectiveness with regard to yield, water use and water quality by evaluating response to different irrigation and fertilizer (N-P-K) inputs.

One tested production system represented industry-average fertilizer and water use whereas a second system used BMP-based inputs, both with seepage irrigation. A third system used BMP-based fertilizer rates with subsurface drip (BMP-drip), which is an alternative to the traditional seepage system.

The industry fertilizer rates and irrigation management were determined from a grower survey and on-farm measurements, respectively. The BMP-based P rates were based on a Mehlich-1 (M1) soil P test, whereas industry rates represented the average of survey results.

For tomatoes, they were 162 pounds of P₂O5 per acre, and for watermelon, they were 170 pounds P₂O5 per acre.

The industry system was maintained at a higher soil moisture than the BMP systems, which were managed by measuring soil moisture in the bed. The water table depths for the industry system were shallower compared with the BMP system. Concentrations of P in the plant, soil and groundwater were measured.

Tomato yields measured across three P rates and four growing seasons were not different, indicating that no adverse impact of reduced fertilizer rates occurred. Yield effects for watermelon varied across the two seasons tested.

During one season, there was no difference in yield; during the other season, yields for the industry average fields were higher, mainly due to a wetter-than-average spring that resulted in an extremely high water table that leached potassium and nitrogen from the beds.

However, no effect of P fertilizer rates on yield could be established. Although P concentrations in the leaf tissue for the BMP system were lower than the industry average, they were within the sufficiency range.

Despite a 35 percent higher P rate applied in the industry system (162 pounds P₂O5/acre) compared with the BMP (120 pounds P₂O5/acre) systems, the M1-P values remained similar as long as both systems received P inputs.

Prev 1 2 Next All

Comments (0) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight